I agree with previous comments, I would not worry about using the rack on your SH. I think some readers (myself included) are almost shocked to see negative things written about products in magazines since most mags are merely long editorial advertisements, and any verbiage not glowingly positive must mean something is terribly wrong. One of the things that distinguishes BQ from other cycling publications is its willingness to tell the whole story regarding the stuff they review, including any negative aspects. Some of these negatives are down to personal opinion, and you have to keep that in mind. As far as I know BQ is not out to sell advertising since it is paid for by its readers, and I think that is what allows it to be interesting.
Matt On Tuesday, October 1, 2013 10:38:17 PM UTC-4, Edwin W wrote: > > In the picture of Mark's rack on the Calfee Adventure, the caption reads, > "Heavy and flexible Mark's rack seems out of place on such a high end > bike." What are the stiff and light options? Custom? > > I am thinking of getting a Mark's rack when I can get the cash together. I > don't mind the heavy part, but are they overly flexible? > > Edwin "He's not heavy, he's my Sam." > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
