So the theory is that low q is ranked higher than having one's legs/feet/ankles 
rotating in different circles?  That doesn't sit right with me but i am 
probably over thinking it.  Rivendell's advocacy of pedaling free would address 
this issue but I don't care for it. It doesn't bother me on my commute bike 
with toe clips but on other bikes with spd style clips i worry it would cause 
issues.  I don't know enough about annatomy and leg mechanics to confirm that 
however. 

This was also sent as a "reply to group via phone" test. Patrick Moore if you 
get this twice then it has started working.

Jason

On Aug 3, 2013, at 3:16 PM, Patrick Moore <bertin...@gmail.com> wrote:

> AFAIK, the reason is to get as small a Q as possible while allowing 
> sufficient clearance for the stays and proper chainline. I think this was 
> particularly popular in the old days for triples -- the right stuck out 
> further to accommodate proper chain line. I could lose ~5 mm on my XD2 if I 
> could get an assym 108 to replace the present 113 on the Fargo. (Q with the 
> 113 is an acceptable, to me, 160.)
> 
> 
> On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 4:12 PM, JL <subfas...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I was giving my commuter bike CBO a quick check over and noticed that the 
>> crankset sits asymetric to the frame.  It has never bothered me but my 
>> question is - aside from cranks that are made offset so an asymetrical BB 
>> actually aligns them symetrically - what is the purpose of asymetrical BBs?  
>> I imagine the argument that it allows the chainrings to clear the chainstay, 
>> or chainline to be zeroed in and usually people dont notice could be made.  
>> I have a hard time imagining a design that intends someone's legs to pedal 
>> like that for long periods of time.  Does anyone know an historic or design 
>> origin for the asym bb?  
>> 
>> Jason
>> SF,CA
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> http://resumespecialties.com/index.html
> patrickmo...@resumespecialties.com
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/patrickmooreresumespec/
> 
> 
> Albuquerque, NM
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>  
>  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to