On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Ron Mc <bulldog...@gmail.com> wrote: . By the time you add in lycra > riding diapers, Brooks is a less expensive saddle. What surprises me is how > the word doesn't get out to the techy bike culture - of course, they're hung > up on grams.
Could it be that, possibly, there's a reason why some women don't like Brooks saddles? Could it be there's a reason that women's saddles with cutouts were invented? I'm glad that Brooks saddles work for a lot of you. Please don't fall into the trap of believing that because Brooks saddles are comfortable for you, they must be comfortable for me too, but somehow I'm foolishly avoiding them. Rule of thumb: If you sit down on a saddle, and you're not sitting on your sit bones, and no matter how you adjust the saddle, you're still not sitting on your sit bones: that saddle is not for you. No matter what you do, that saddle will still not be for you. -- -- Anne Paulson My hovercraft is full of eels -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.