On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Ron Mc <bulldog...@gmail.com> wrote:
 .  By the time you add in lycra
> riding diapers, Brooks is a less expensive saddle.  What surprises me is how
> the word doesn't get out to the techy bike culture - of course, they're hung
> up on grams.

Could it be that, possibly, there's a reason why some women don't like
Brooks saddles? Could it be there's a reason that women's saddles with
cutouts were invented?

I'm glad that Brooks saddles work for a lot of you. Please don't fall
into the trap of believing that because Brooks saddles are comfortable
for you, they must be comfortable for me too, but somehow I'm
foolishly avoiding them.

Rule of thumb: If you sit down on a saddle, and you're not sitting on
your sit bones, and no matter how you adjust the saddle, you're still
not sitting on your sit bones: that saddle is not for you. No matter
what you do, that saddle will still not be for you.

-- 
-- Anne Paulson

My hovercraft is full of eels

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

Reply via email to