On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 15:44 -0700, James Warren wrote: > Well, I'm not sure why SRAM designed it since triples are perfectly good. > > But given that it is coming out, I know that if I had a bike that was > designed to not have a front derailleur, I would certainly want all my > gearing covered with one ring. I do not want to get off to shift by hand or > shift with a stick. Hence the 42 in back would appeal to me. > > But honestly, I don't think I'd buy the Rivendell that doesn't allow front > shifting while pedaling. (Unless it were a wide-ranging IGH bike.)
Why would a wide-range IGH be better than a single-chainring wide range derailleur bike? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
