I don't think I'd want to change the brake just to get .2mm of
additional tire under a fender.  This bike already rides nicely. What
I would want to do is squeeze every bit of comfort possible out of it
for long rides without affecting its performance and generally sporty
nature as I bought this precisely because I found my Sam sluggish for
unladen or lightly-laden duty.  I have no desire to turn the Rom into
a Sam and even if I were to hang the Sam's parts on an A.H.H. I would
build it up with an eye towards comfort and carrying saddle bags,
etc.  If I'm limited to a very smooth supple 28 tire on the Rom for
sportier riding that's going to be just fine.

On Jan 6, 10:27 am, Joe Bernard <joerem...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In my opinion, a classic road bike has shorter chainstays and lower bars
> (circa the '80s) than a Ram/Rom/AHH. The latter to me is more of a sport
> tourer, which would be a classic road bike stretched a bit, with a higher
> headtube. In my mind, the full-on touring line is drawn at beefier frame
> tubes and cantilever brakes.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

Reply via email to