On Thu, 2011-12-29 at 10:16 -0800, Anne Paulson wrote:
> 
> And the other thing about these light bikes that annoys me is, OK, you
> will ride faster up hills on a lighter bike, all other things being
> equal. That is perfectly true, and in my club we do a lot of hills.
> But... this is only a positional good. That is, if everybody buys a
> lighter bike, then everybody will be just that little bit faster, but
> nobody is any better off. That is, Ted can still beat Susan, and Susan
> can still beat Alan, but the order of arrival at the top of the hill
> will be exactly the same as if they all rode Rivendells. It's a
> pointless arms race. And my club is big, so we have lots of rides for
> people of all abilities, so riders can always find people of about the
> same speed anyway.

I remember when boutique wheels came on the scene.  There was a bunch of
guys in my bike club who always rode together.  First one, then the
next, eventually one by one, they all switched to high-zoot boutique
wheels.  It was an arms race, with the goal of being the fastest in the
pack.  When it was all over, everyone was in exactly the same position
in the pack that they'd been in before, but collectively they'd spent
enough on wheels to buy a new car.  But they all felt FAST.  And looked
PRO.






-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

Reply via email to