On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 6:59 PM, james black <chocot...@gmail.com> wrote: [...]
> but his blog offends me, and I'm happy to explain why. He objectifies > women! He is, in essence, a professional pornographer, exploiting > people for his own self-promotion. > > What exactly does "objectify" mean? Never was sure. Do you mean the blog about pretty young women in high fashion riding bikes? Rather light fare, I opine, but why worse than showing roadies in 2011 spring cycling fashions (lifted *that* term from the latest Co Cycl Cat) on the latest crabon wonders? Is it because the audience is probably men? But why should looking at pretty girls be bad, even if they are on bicycles? I smell, nay, hear, discern and anticipate the impending, ineluctible, overawing and highly terrible roar of a mons parturating a mus. -- Patrick Moore Albuquerque, NM For professional resumes, contact Patrick Moore, ACRW at patrickmo...@resumespecialties.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
