For a long time I used 170s on all my bikes.  A few years ago I went to
172.5 on one and then a few other bikes.  All the guidelines said 175 is
probably too long for me, not being 6'5" rather than 5'6".

The 172.5s resulted in a greater sense of power per pedal stroke, and a
lower cadence.  I find I'm faster at a lower cadence (which feels very
responsive) but not faster overall.  I also find that on longer rides I have
more tendency for knee stress if I don't consciously maintain a high 90+
cadence.

Being able to maintain this cadence comfortably is now a sensitive function
of saddle positioning.  I'm working this out this winter with indoor
training, but I'm also planning to buy a long-distance bike.  I'm thinking
pretty seriously of going back to 170s on that, to be able to spin easily
when I'm getting too tired to think about it very much.  I still ride my
bikes that have 170s, and a fast, fluid spin flows well with that crank
length.

On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 4:58 PM, AmiSingh <asd...@gmail.com> wrote:

> So ... The longer 195 crank arms ARE more comfortable and allow me to
> get down easier on a larger chainring.
>
> I spent a long while searching extra long arms out and am pushing the
> limits on what GP recommended. But for me it's been worth it - I like
> them.
>
> Just curious, does anyone have experience with longer or shorter than
> the usual 165-175mm crank arms?  I so, what have you discovered or
> learned?
>
> On Dec 31 2010, 11:44 am, robert zeidler <zeidler.rob...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Isn't the technical term "a shit-eating grin"?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 3:33 PM, AmiSingh <asd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > My bicycle came alive today, and we were synchronized.  It was a great
> > > feeling.  Euphoria hit and and drivers kept staring. Maybe it's was
> > > because of the big fellow in the red rain-coat riding atop the
> > > turmeric-colored double-top-tubed bicycle.  I felt like it was because
> > > they were celebrating with me in sharing the huge smile upon my
> > > face. :)
> >
> > > I gotta say, today was a good day.
> >
> > > Here's a photo for your viewing pleasure:
> >
> > >http://www.flickr.com/photos/amisingh/5307702174/in/photostream/
> >
> > > TA Carmina 185 cranks, Sugino chainrings 52 / 38, Shimano Ultegra 6700
> > > rear derailleur.  And waxed chain with a 80 / 20 Mix of Paraffin to
> > > Bees Wax for clean silent riding.
> >
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> > > "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
> .
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<rbw-owners-bunch%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com><rbw-owners-bunch%2Bunsubscrib
> e...@googlegroups.com>
>  > > .
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
> To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<rbw-owners-bunch%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
>
>


-- 
Ken Freeman
Ann Arbor, MI USA

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

Reply via email to