I do wish you all would put on some weight! :) The folks at RBW can't afford to carry everything in my size (several- X L) unless enough of us qualify for that grand and glorious size.
Oh well, they still have XXL normal riding pants, knickers (of which I have ordered two pair; let them laugh!), and shorts. The pants and shorts fit really well, so presumably the knickers will too. It's the rain pants and the shirts, primarily, that you folks need to grow into. Let's work at it, people! Eat! And please *demand* seersucker! Seer-suck-er! Seer-suck-er! Yours, Thomas Lynn Skean On Sep 5, 10:16 am, Frank <pguil...@gmail.com> wrote: > "A little bit more tailored fit would be good too, they look baggy > around the crotch, judging from the photos on the site." > > Matter of taste. I'm 6'0 / 165 and from first availability I've worn > the knickers and the MUSA shorts in size XL. Sure they're baggy - > that's how I like them. They don't bind on the bike, bunch up on the > saddle, or materially reduce my aerodynamical swerve. > > I just bought two new pair of shorts in my last order because the > Rivendell stuff doesn't always stick around long-term (I'm still > unhappy about the tweedy cardigan that I sent back for replacement > under the "bad placket" program that was converted into a refund / > credit as there tweren't no more), and these are my favorite bottom > bits, without question. > > I hope they keep making the knickers, shorts, and extend the MUSA > brand. I'm with Beth; the railroad shirts are great, too. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
