Since no one with more knowledge than dumb-old me has answered yet: I don't know anything about hamstrings and quads but I do know that is indeed a very setback post you're using on a rather slack seattube. Considering that you're also using a short stem I think you could keep your current reach by shifting your whole body forward. Maybe not a zero-setback post, I'm thinking a Nitto S65 post and 7cm stem.
Joe Bernard On Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 8:24:22 PM UTC-8 atreya...@gmail.com wrote: > Group , need your thoughts on drop bar fit . I recently bought homer > Hilsen ( most recent batch ) . I have short torso but long legs and arms . > My height is 5’8.5 ish and pbh is 86.5. I have homer in 54.5 , which has tt > of 57.5. I am running a short stem 50mm and nitto m151(75 mm reach) . I am > also using nitto lugged seat post , which I understand has a lot of set > back.The reach seems to be working fine , however I do find my hamstrings > are getting taxed way more than I like compared to my quads especially on > climbs in the saddle . My understanding is that homer has a slack seat tube > angle of 71.5. Will running a zero set back seatpost help ? Has anybody run > zero setback posts on rivs. I understand that general recommendation is to > have more set back . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/c3877033-8b08-4c6f-b4ec-28b0a35fa178n%40googlegroups.com.