I would like to echo Patrick's thoughts. Beth, Patrick, and I are all
riding Rivendell 26ers, with higher trail than the Kogswells used in
the BQ tests. My bike is a 1996 Allrounder. After several tries at
smaller tires (Such as Ritchey Tom Slicks) and larger tires (such as
Marathon XRs), I found my happy place with the 1.5inch Marathon Racer.
It seems to have few compromises for road and light dirt riding.

On Apr 19, 7:55 pm, Steve Palincsar <palin...@his.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 18:14 -0700, b hamon wrote:
> > After reading Jan's article about fatter tires in the latest BQ, I
> > decided to try it on my All-Rounder. I'd gotten this frameset about
> > three years ago and built it up with drop bars. (Although the height
> > of the frame was a little short for my legs, the top tube was the
> > right length for drops.) I've ridden it on numerous city and country
> > rides and have done a couple of bike-camping overnights on it (longest
> > rides on this have been several metric centuries). I have wrestled
> > with the feel of this bike since building it up with 26 x 1.25
> > Paselas. Although the tires help up well, the feel of the 1.25 width
> > seemed sort of harsh, and worse, squirrelly.
>
> > In the absence of a pair of T-Serv tires just sitting around, I
> > installed some 1.5 Paselas, and ran some errands while at work. I
> > noticed the difference in handling pretty much right away. The bike
> > rolled easily but cornered more gently and without as much of the
> > squirrelly feeling I'd had with the skinnier tires. Just for fun, I
> > also raised the handlebar about 1/2". Now the bike looks sort of odd
> > because the handlebars are so close to the saddle; but I have a really
> > short torso and had let go of the "classic" look of a road bike long
> > ago anyway. What I have now is a more comfortable bike with a mellower
> > ride quality.
>
> 1.5" isn't extraordinarily wide for a 559 to begin with.  What's more,
> going by the chart on p. 20 of BQ Spring 2010, the 'stable yet nimble'
> zone for 559 extends roughly from 38mm wide to about 48mm.  I'd try a
> 559 x 1.75" tire to see how that feels - it's squarely in the "gray"
> zone.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
> To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group 
> athttp://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

Reply via email to