Personally I like all the options shown better than two parallel toptubes. They all look like reinforcing structures to me whereas the paralle TT's just look redundant...what's that thing that's in the eye of the be-whatsits?
Steve -----Original Message----- From: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com [mailto:rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com]on Behalf Of happyriding Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 1:49 PM To: RBW Owners Bunch Subject: [RBW] Re: Diagonapillar On Apr 5, 9:51 am, Garth <garth...@gmail.com> wrote: > Eric, > > Riv isn't going to make any drastic changes to the Hunq, or else > they'd have to call it something else. > > What you see here is pure fantasy. One thought about TT's not being > parallel and all of the sudden we have a whole new frame? > Nah. Did you see the name of the op? It's not April 1 anymore, either. Oh, yeah. Here is james black's suggested tube orientation--the two triangles are better than one geometry: http://www.flickr.com/photos/49416...@n00/4494282750/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
