I think that's a good idea too!. I'll try it. You are definitely visualizing the problem anyway. Meanwhile, you bring up a question I've had:
I don't want to "complain" at all. I'm not unhappy. But, being a distant mail-order-only customer, I have no personal relationship with Rivendell. What do Grant and the crew think about getting unsolicited "feedback?" I have this image in my mind that they get random complaints and "suggestions" all the time from armchair bike designers, and I don't want to be one of 'those guys.' It does seem like something that should be addressed on future batches or future bikes though. (Along with reversing the bottom napkin ring and whatever other little glitches are discovered.) On the other hand, I always got the feeling that this particular bike was intended, as much as anything, as a way to use up some lugs and parts that didn't get used elsewhere, and as an experiment with maxing-out the new chainstays - but that it wasn't going to be around indefinitely. If that's the case, its hardly worth sweating such minor details. On Wednesday, December 30, 2015 at 4:18:23 PM UTC-7, William deRosset wrote: > > Dear Keith, > > A set of four (two pair) of the concave/convex washers sold with v-brake > pads would sort that issue, one on either side of the fender. The best > solution would have been for that threaded boss to have been oriented to > the axis of the hub, I.e. rotating the boss fifteen degrees or so. > Complain, and they'll fix it on the next batch. Or not. > > Best, > > Will > William M deRosset > Fort Collins > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
