Even if you could do that, it's only a relatively meaningless fraction
of the story, because it doesn't get at how much AMOUNT of ATTRIBUTE is
GOOD for WHAT and WHOM.
You could probably pretty easily quantify tube stiffness. But can you
get agreement on how much stiffness is best?
On 09/05/2015 03:31 PM, Justin August wrote:
I mused about ideas like this a while ago. It would be fantastic to develop objective methods of
observation and measuring the properties of frames. Then you could adjust the tubes, lengths and
buts based on the properties that it gives you when mounted upon it. Like this material gives you
AMOUNT of ATTRIBUTE when used on a TUBE PLCEMENT with TYPE OF BUT at LENGTH and under RIDER WEIGHT
etc etc. I don't know if this type of wide range analysis is possible but it would push folks away
from describing "stiffness" or "compliance" and towards describing objective
response to stimuli.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
