Remember the Riv frames are measured center to top . So a 60 c-c frame is really about 61.4 assuming 28.4mm top tubes .
I'd base my decision on the bars I'll be using, the bar height, and top tube length . Front-center too. I make no compromise when it comes to these , I have a minimum and it's not negotiable. Standover height is really not that important . I ride a 60cm Bombadil and I have a pbh of 91.6 or so . PBH is longer than your pant inseam , and pant inseam is wholly arbitrary anyways . PBH is literally , pubic BONE to the floor . It is measured firmly against the bone , yes, ouch , but it is at least binding . In pants I can wear inseams from 32-35 inches , as fit "depends" on firstmost, personal preference for what a "fit" is ! You've got low rise, high rise, gussets no gussets , infinite kinds of gussets and design patterns , there just is no standard to a garment ! Thankfully :) On Thursday, August 20, 2015 at 11:20:22 PM UTC-4, Jason Braaten wrote: > > Hi All, > > I'm considering purchasing a Hunqapillar in the near future, as I want to > combine my love for roads and dirt onto the same vessel. I'm 6'2" with a > 34 inseam and typically ride a 60cm st ctc on my vintage road bikes and XL > mountain bike. I haven't measured my pbh, however was hoping to get > opinions from Hunqapillar owners who are ridding 58cm and 62cm's. Curious > what the 6' - 6'3 crowd is riding and how you like it. On the road bikes, > 62cm is usually a little too large for my liking. Any opinions are greatly > appreciated. > > Thanks in advance > > J Braaten > Brick, NJ 08724 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
