Drew: I see your point. The way I've used it is to scratch out a quickie cue sheet between stops with only the pertinent navigational info to the next planned stop. That way if I don't feel like taking the detour to the lighthouse or something I skip it. Over breakfast, coffee, lunch, etc., I'll just figure what I need to know about the next segment. I'm easily overloaded by TMI. Plus I'm seldom on their exact schedule.
dougP On Friday, July 3, 2015 at 4:27:19 PM UTC-7, drew wrote: > > Hey Doug, > You're right. Information wise, it's not too off the mark, though it > really only presents one route. What I found infuriating was the half > bullet point/half description directions where the format shifts > constantly. Keeping it simple ie. "Left on 2nd" "right on 3rd" etc. would > be ideal, but frequently the specific directional change or multiple > directional changes will be buried in an opinion paragraph that shouldn't > be in the bullet point direction parts. Especially when there are already > pages of opinion and description for each section. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
