On Sep 12, 2009, at 11:30 AM, JoelMatthews wrote: > If Patagonia's statement is true - that SIGG actively mislead it about > BPA content - that is a pretty serious shortcoming in my book. It is > one thing to argue the science behind the product. It is another > altogether to lie about the content. > > I sent my Sigg bottle back through the Sigg about two weeks ago and so > far have heard nothing from the company about the exchange. I guess I > should have photocopied all my materials. Appears maybe I lost my > money on that one. Oh well.
I wouldn't sweat it yet. Sigg might get 100,000 bottles back, I suppose. Since the company has 127 employees worldwide, according to the CEO's letter, it might take them a while to process the returns. Imagine Riv having to recall 1000 bike frames or something, with the tiny staff they have it would be a nightmare undertaking (probably one of the reasons Grant is so particular about who makes Riv frames and his relatively conservative designs). --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
