On Aug 22, 2009, at 11:43 AM, Brewster Fong wrote:

> But, is there really that many people demanding road 650b or is it
> just another fading fad?

Unless Trek and Cannondale and Specialized are listing 650B bikes,  
it's at best a niche market.  If it lasts for a year or two it's a  
fad and I think that is likely to be the case without the size  
becoming mainstreamed.  Bike shops aren't going to sell enough to  
make it worth their while to stock the tires and rims, and  
manufacturers are going to see it as a nuisance unless they can sell  
enough every year to make it worth setting up the machines.  Even in  
France, Michelin and Wolber only do one short run a year of rims and  
tires.

I'm sure it's a nice size and works well, many people like it and  
sing its praises, but to me there is nothing compelling about 650B to  
make it worth the expense to either buy or convert a bike to that  
size.  I can run 559 x 32 mm or wider tires on my All-Rounder and  
they work fine (so well that I ended up shelving my vague thoughts of  
converting the A/R a la Ron Lau); Paselas are good tires, readily  
available at most bike shops and much cheaper than comparable 650B  
tires.  I can run 700 x 28s or wider on my road bikes and they are  
fast and cushy.

I think the energy devoted into 650B would have been much better  
expended on getting a good road rim along the lines of the MA-2 into  
the market, with box construction, a low profile, polished finish and  
true nipple sockets.  That seems to me to be the glaring oversight in  
the market now, not yet another tire size.

Sorry to be heretical.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to