larouxn left a comment (openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#6333)
> So we switched to using https://github.com/fullstaq-ruby/server-edition and
> once we did that there was little reason not to use the latest version.
TIL this is a thing. Neat! :+1:
Am I understanding correctly that production is running Ruby 3.4.5 but
development for which Docker is encouraged is using Ruby 3.2 re: below?
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/blob/d85d1309c1ed1f14b5ee300ef0b182c725940d35/Dockerfile#L1
I understand supporting non-EOL Rubies (3.2, 3.3, 3.4) but should this be
bumped to
[3.4-bookerworm](https://hub.docker.com/layers/library/ruby/3.4-bookworm/images/sha256-1390a133776f76f63d3e99d9c45b5f3353b1af41044024ff8098a5cd993c97cb)?
That would actually better accomplish what this PR was trying to do since it
synchronizes development and production Ruby versions.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/6333#issuecomment-3206916969
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
<openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/6333/c3206916...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
rails-dev mailing list
rails-dev@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/rails-dev
