pablobm left a comment (openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#6333)
Thank you all for the interesting conversation. Am I correct in understanding
the following?
- The main OpenStreetMap web app runs Ruby 3.4.5.
- This is an FOSS app that anyone can install and run on their own, and for
this reason OSM wants to support a certain infrastructure flexibility, in this
case with Ruby versions.
If the above is correct, then having people developing under different rubies
can be useful. CI runs several versions, but test coverage is not great so
things can slip.
Having said that, I do feel a bit weird about the misalignment between
development and production. Although Ruby is relatively stable,
incompatibilities do happen. Having `.ruby-version` will not affect your
development if you don't use any of these version management tools. However, if
you do use them and you prefer developing with a different Ruby version, then
perhaps there's a problem: the tool may get in the way and push you to use the
given version (with some it can be configured away, but it's still a friction).
As for the choice of minimum Ruby version, am I correct that the supported
versions of Ruby depend on the Rails version? Rails 8.0 supports Ruby 3.2+, so
I'm guessing the support grid will change when upgrading to a new Rails in the
future.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/6333#issuecomment-3206541879
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
<openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/6333/c3206541...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
rails-dev mailing list
rails-dev@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/rails-dev
