1ec5 left a comment (openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#5966)
> I also wouldn't say it's that common for open source projects that are
> primarily code based to go to the trouble of specifying a different license
> for artwork. I'm sure it does happen but I can't think of any examples off
> the top of my head.
It happens with some map style repositories, such as [this fork of OSM
Carto](https://imagico.de/blog/en/on-open-map-design-licensing/) and [Mapbox’s
original vector
styles](https://github.com/mapbox/mapbox-gl-styles/blob/c4b34ab336fdb70be489fa018f2fe9e6f341b4f5/LICENSE.md),
but these projects are known primarily for their visual output. Some vector
tile schemas license “cartographic design” separately from the code, such as
[OpenMapTiles](https://github.com/openmaptiles/openmaptiles/blob/f70ae783b286e362431efc53a07dfa35472be2bd/LICENSE.md),
in order to require attribution in the finished product. Occasionally I’ve
seen website projects separately license graphical elements within, but I don’t
know of any OSM-related examples off the top of my head.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/5966#issuecomment-2845086226
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
<openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/5966/2845086...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
rails-dev mailing list
rails-dev@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/rails-dev
