andrewharvey left a comment (openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#5758)
> If OSMCha has it, why copy the same thing to osm.org? If someone needs
> accurate data, that's what OSMCha is for.
Better to have this by default on OSM.org in my opinion. Fragmenting into many
different tools makes the learning curve harder and many people won't discover
those tools. Then you had the add challenge of needing to copy paste changeset
IDs all the time because all you have is a link to osm.org.
Currently OSMCha is very painful to use, 15 seconds load time for each
changeset to review, 10 seconds to load the list of changesets, if they have a
useful feature then that's more the reason to add it back into OSM.org.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/5758#issuecomment-2712262271
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
<openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/5758/2712262...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
rails-dev mailing list
rails-dev@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/rails-dev
