The `involves` is fine, and correct, but there's really no need for a comma
after `e.g.` any more than there would be if you spelled it in full - the
dictionary example you pointed at is rather different because it's between two
commas as an aside.
What would probably be good is simply to expand `e.g.` as `for example` which
is likely to be more readable for people that don't have english as a first
language.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/5637#issuecomment-2646521870
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
<openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/5637/c2646521...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
rails-dev mailing list
rails-dev@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/rails-dev
