> How does this relate to the notes restructuring plan from
> https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/3831?
What I was going to say in comments for #5294 is that the plan from #3831 tries
to solve [*(a)* by ignoring
*(b)*](https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/5294#issuecomment-2541527509).
You can read the original post of #3831 and see that it doesn't mention not
actions at all. And those actions, they are stored in the comments table.
You'll still have another *leaky abstraction* as that post says. Note comments
won't be really comments. You'll close a note without a comment, that will
still generate a "comment" entry in `NoteComments`.
> Is this a step on the way to that or is it going in a different direction?
The direction is hopefully the same for things stated explicitly in #3831. It's
different for things omitted.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/5485#issuecomment-2579591777
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
<openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/5485/c2579591...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
rails-dev mailing list
rails-dev@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/rails-dev
