At Wed, 5 Jun 2019 19:41:19 -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote: > On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 07:09:52AM -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote: > > On a Racket variant that supports single-flonum values (like the > ^^^^^^^^ > > current version of Racket), the compiler will constant-fold that > > expression to a single-flonum value, so the compiled code is the same > > as writing a single-flonum literal. On a Racket variant that does > > support single-flonum values, however, that expression will raise an > ^^^^^^^ > > exception. > > Should one of these "support"s be preceded by "not"?
Yes, the second one should be "does not support". Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/5cf863d8.1c69fb81.4691e.0452SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING%40gmr-mx.google.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
