On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 11:19:11AM +0100, Laurent wrote: > Same here, I've grown happy with the #:keyword notation because it is a > reader thing, not a symbol. > > The other nice option would be like Python and others to make procedure > implicitly take dictionaries to allow choosing at each call site between > position-based and name-based argument passing for each argument. I guess > if the dictionary's arguments of the caller is accessible at compile time, > it should be feasible to lose nothing in terms of run-time speed. > Dictionary building and passing at run-time would likely be slower though.
That sounds something that would fit conceptually into typed racket. -- hendrik -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.