On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 01:41:25PM -0400, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
>
> * The `let`-ish forms add terse support for frequent multiple-value LHS
> (without burdening single-value LHS, nor increasing rightward drift).
The notation I've found useful against rightward drift in a Lispish
language is this:
Instead of writing s-expressions like (a b c (d e f ( g h i)))
where the letters stand for arbitrary s-expressions
wrote them as (a b c / d e f /g h i), or in multilint format
(a c b
( d e f
( g h i
)))
I could write
( a b c
/ d e f
/ g h i
)
Of course, in Racket you'd have to find another symbol than / because
it's already taken
Aking advantage of this, I also had a nonrecursive let:
( let a b
/ let c d
/ let e f
/ g a c e
)
-- hendrik
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
