On Monday, August 27, 2018 at 11:41:52 AM UTC+2, Jérôme Martin wrote: > > I live not so far from Bruxelles so I'd be glad to be a part of it! > > I'd love to talk about how easy it is to write DSLs in Racket, and about > how you can replace your data with DSLs. > Something like "Who needs JSON when you can DSL?". >
That will be very intersting! I use s-expr myself in my 'over HTTP API' with a safe as possible 'read' procedure (based on parser combinators). Anyway, anything DSL is good to take for me, as I think there is much to be learned. > One of the examples would be Scribble, but I'm also thinking about showing > some DSLs I wrote (a CPU emulator language, an ASM, a WebAssembly > transpiler...). > > If you have any ideas about a cool DSL made in Racket we could show off, > don't hesitate to suggest it here! > > We could also do workshops about <buzztalk>leveraging the power of > syntax-parse</buzztalk> or something along those lines. > It's one of the most powerful constructs in Racket, so for already > seasoned schemers, it might be the selling point. > A tutorial on syntax parser will be very welcome! > Talking about web development could be nice too, but I'm not feeling > confident enough in my exploration of writing Racket for the web > Don't be shy ;] > to be able to survive the flow of questions about load-balancing > What do you mean by load balancing? HAProxy or something like that doesn't work? > and server rendering buzz. > Can you be more precise. Server rendering in s-expr based languages is a blast. It's very nice because XML in s-expr feels very natural. Compare that to JavaScript via babeljs, even Python is tried and is trying to do it (ask me for references if you want). (I'm an experienced enough web developer to know that I shouldn't talk > about web development > I will be very glad if you could share more about that. I am (web) backend developer. > unless I'm willing to get torn apart and eaten alive by the rest of the > industry. It's a wild world.) > But if someone has more than one year of web development with Racket under > his belt, feel free to step into the arena. > > Concerning the format, does somebody have experience about whether we > should do Main Track Talks, Developer Rooms, Stands or Lighting Talks? > - The Main Track is 50 minutes talks (including questions). > - Developer Rooms are focused on open source projects collaboration > (mostly presentations it seems). > - Stands are a table, two chairs, a power socket and an internet access. > - Lightning Talks are 15 minutes talks. > > I am okay with all of them. I'd be glad to organize and animate workshops > on a stand or in a room, and eventually do a lightning talk. > > Are there more people willing to come? > > On Friday, August 24, 2018 at 6:59:43 PM UTC+2, amz3 wrote: >> >> Hello *Racketeers,* >> >> Let's organize a Scheme event at FOSDEM 2019 in Bruxelles. >> >> I started a page on the wiki @ >> http://community.schemewiki.org/?FOSDEM2019 >> >> You can edit the wiki page. The goal of that page is to gather enough >> talk ideas to be able to submit a proposal for a developer room at FOSDEM. >> See the CFP >> https://fosdem.org/2019/news/2018-08-10-call-for-participation/ >> >> >> Best regards, >> >> >> Amirouche aka. amz3 >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
