Sounds like something I would try to fix if I had time to really focus
on the eq? semantic question :(

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 9:01 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Unfortunately, that's only true when eq? produces #t, which probably isn't
> an issue when using eq? directly, but can be when using memq or similar.
> This benchmark suggests about a 10x speed difference when the symbols are
> different: http://pasterack.org/pastes/94877
>
> Sam
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015, 9:52 PM Robby Findler <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> FWIW, if you use equal? in those cases, you'll get the same
>> performance behavior and you will have fewer eq?s to audit when things
>> go wonky.
>>
>> ;)
>>
>> Robby
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 8:36 PM, Neil Van Dyke <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > Whew. :)  I only rarely have a non-symbol use for `eq?`, but I use `eq?`
>> > heavily for symbols in everyday application code.
>> >
>> > Robby Findler wrote on 09/17/2015 09:27 PM:
>> >>
>> >> eq? on symbols is a special part of the specification and that seems
>> >> benign to me, all things considered. The "giant hash in the sky" that
>> >> makes sure that works isn't exactly trouble free, but we seem to have
>> >> it under control.
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> > Groups
>> > "Racket Users" group.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>> > an
>> > email to [email protected].
>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Racket Users" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to