FWIW, if you use equal? in those cases, you'll get the same performance behavior and you will have fewer eq?s to audit when things go wonky.
;) Robby On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 8:36 PM, Neil Van Dyke <[email protected]> wrote: > Whew. :) I only rarely have a non-symbol use for `eq?`, but I use `eq?` > heavily for symbols in everyday application code. > > Robby Findler wrote on 09/17/2015 09:27 PM: >> >> eq? on symbols is a special part of the specification and that seems >> benign to me, all things considered. The "giant hash in the sky" that >> makes sure that works isn't exactly trouble free, but we seem to have >> it under control. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
