Thanks, I'm studying units, at this time they do not seems to be particularly helpful to entangle this mess (seems like more work, not less), but I need to deepen my understanding... Other suggestions will be appreciated as well, in the meantime!
> If the issue you're facing is mutual dependencies between modules, then using > units[1] is one possible solution. > > Units are first-class modules that allow cyclic linking, and would avoid the > need to use include. In particular using #lang racket/unit [2] may be useful > to convert each the modules required by main.rkt into a unit. Then main.rkt > would probably link the required modules together and invoke the result. > > Dan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
