Racket module system is very efficient, but it wont be more efficient in the particular situation of dozens (and counting...) of highly interdependent modules, every one containing a big number of functions to just include all in a single namespace? I can think of various shortcomings (like missing contracts, and obviously more careful choice of names to avoid collisions, not to speak of DrRacket complaining all the time), but maybe it will save disk accesses and some cycles? Keep in mind that in this same situation almost all is needed at any time and the division/grouping of functions is only for logical reason and easier editing... What do you think?
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
