On 4/6/2015 1:49 PM, Lux wrote:
> You almost never have to worry about the efficiency of (second x) (cadr x)
and (car (cdr x)). There are always bigger fish to fry than that.
Sure enough, but what if this simple operation is repeated one billion times?
Micro optimization is largely a waste of time - if you're counting
cycles you should be working in assembler. Better to put your effort
into more efficient algorithms.
George
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
