On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 12:19:03PM -0600, Darren Cruse wrote: > > But in the end I didn't find any perfect answer either. > > I came away wishing that somehow Gambit/Lambdanative could be enhanced to > be Racket compatible... if only I had a magic wand. :)
A viable common subset would be nice. How different are the standards these implementations are approximations to? -- hendrik ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
