I think the correct answer in this context is "it can't be done." :-)
On Feb 28, 2014, at 7:49 AM, Daniel Carrera wrote: > Hello, > > I am a fairly new user of Scheme and Racket. My question is, now that > R7RS-small is out, when can I expect to see support added to Racket / > DrRacket? In other words, I would like to be able to type "#lang r7rs" in a > way analogous to how today I can enter "#lang r5rs" and "#lang r6rs". > > Given that R7RS-small is not that much larger than R5RS, how difficult would > it be for Racket developers to include it? From my naive point of view, I > suppose that the main obstacle is adding the R7RS-compliant library support. > Everything else that I see in the spec seems to already exist in default > Racket. > > Cheers, > Daniel. > -- > When an engineer says that something can't be done, it's a code phrase that > means it's not fun to do. > ____________________ > Racket Users list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
