Is that a task suitable for a new user? Daniel.
On 28 February 2014 15:06, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sa...@cs.indiana.edu> wrote: > Right now, I think most Racketeers are focused on making Racket the > best Racket we can, rather than on Scheme, so I don't know of anyone > currently planning to work on this. However, the flexibility of Racket > means that it should be quite reasonable to adapt the existing R6RS > and R5RS implementation to produce a package that supports R7RS. If > you wanted to work on this, I'm sure there would be plenty of people > on this list who could give you pointers. > > Sam > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 7:49 AM, Daniel Carrera <dcarr...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I am a fairly new user of Scheme and Racket. My question is, now that > > R7RS-small is out, when can I expect to see support added to Racket / > > DrRacket? In other words, I would like to be able to type "#lang r7rs" > in a > > way analogous to how today I can enter "#lang r5rs" and "#lang r6rs". > > > > Given that R7RS-small is not that much larger than R5RS, how difficult > would > > it be for Racket developers to include it? From my naive point of view, I > > suppose that the main obstacle is adding the R7RS-compliant library > support. > > Everything else that I see in the spec seems to already exist in default > > Racket. > > > > Cheers, > > Daniel. > > -- > > When an engineer says that something can't be done, it's a code phrase > that > > means it's not fun to do. > > > > ____________________ > > Racket Users list: > > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users > > > -- When an engineer says that something can't be done, it's a code phrase that means it's not fun to do.
____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
