On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 2:09 AM, Chad Albers <calb...@neomantic.com> wrote: > From the many responses, it looks like Dr Racket is more popular than > I thought. I'm a long-time Emacs user, and although I have tried Dr > Racket, Emacs is now part of my bones. (I'm excited to learn that > there is a Racket mode...and hope it is as good as geiser).
Just to be clear, the two most mature and respected Emacs modes for working with Racket are: 1. Quack 2. Geiser The "racket-mode" project I have on GitHub is a 0.1 alpha quality thing I cobbled together for my own use, after having some difficulty with Quack on Emacs 24+, and during a brief period when Racket's `enter!' module wasn't always reloading modules. I put it on GitHub because that's effectively my backup system for code. Although I'm still using it out of inertia, I am definitely NOT trying to promote it as being better than Quack or Geiser, which are amazing things with years of excellent work put into them. I think my README makes that clear, so you'll realize that when you see it. But if anyone thinks it's not clear enough, let me know and I'd be happy to make it clearer. </disclaimer> ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
