Hi Matthew, Got home tonight, brought up DrRacket as you mentioned, brought up some simple code, ran it, clicked debug and wham, Windows message... so I went to the cmd window and tried to hit Ctrl-C many times and nothing seemed to happen, after a while I got a "do you want to send infomation to microsoft" box came up. It mentioned 3 files, a .txt file, a .xml file and a .mdmp file. the txt file and .xml files are short but seem uninteresting the mdmp file is about 2 MB.
Let me know if you want to see any of these files. Regards, -Joe On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Joe Gilray <jgil...@gmail.com> wrote: > OK, will do. If I see anything I will post it. > > Regards, > -joe > > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu>wrote: > >> Thanks --- knowing that it looks like a frozen process instead of a >> memory fault is useful. >> >> If you start DrRacket in a terminal as >> >> racket -l drracket >> >> then, when DrRacket get stuck again, there's a small chance that typing >> Ctl-C in the terminal will produce a useful context listing. It's >> probably worth a try, anyway. >> >> At Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:29:19 -0800, Joe Gilray wrote: >> > No problem, Matthew, I know that I've been less-than-specific, here's >> what >> > I can say: >> > >> > Since 5.3.2, I've seen about 7 crashes, they all act the same: Win7 >> > suddenly says "the program is not responding". At least twice it's >> > happened when I hit the debugger button in DrRacket. Otherwise it feels >> > random (at least once when clicking on the definitions window, at least >> > once when simply running a program in the interactions pane). >> > >> > Thanks, >> > -Joe >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Matthew Flatt <mfl...@cs.utah.edu> >> wrote: >> > >> > > FWIW, I'm not ignoring your reports of crashes on 64-bit Windows, but >> I >> > > haven't yet done enough work on it. I'm still looking for a way to >> > > provoke crashes, and the thought that the debugger might be relevant >> is >> > > helpful. >> > > >> > > At Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:08:59 -0800, Joe Gilray wrote: >> > > > I had a problem with my test code that led me to believe that the >> 64-bit >> > > > version of 5.3.3 was faster than the 32-bit version... to >> paraphrase SNL >> > > > from the good old days: "never mind." >> > > > >> > > > I still do see crashes on the 64-bit version and not on 32-bit: The >> > > > crashes still seem random, but do seem to occur more often in the >> > > debugger. >> > > > >> > > > Regards, >> > > > -Joe >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Joe Gilray <jgil...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > Has anyone else noticed that the 64-bit version on Win7 is faster >> than >> > > the >> > > > > 32-bit version? >> > > > > >> > > > > I thought that the longer pointers were supposed to slow down >> > > execution. >> > > > > >> > > > > BTW, still seeing some crashes on 64-bit and none on 32-bit >> > > > > >> > > > > Thoughts? >> > > > > -Joe >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Joe Gilray <jgil...@gmail.com> >> > > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > >> Thanks Racketeers, >> > > > >> >> > > > >> I am still seeing crashes on Win7 64bit with 5.3.3. About every >> 6 >> > > hours >> > > > >> or so I get "program not responding" (doesn't seem to correlate >> to >> > > anything >> > > > >> in particular). >> > > > >> >> > > > >> Haven't seen it on Win7 32 bit. >> > > > >> >> > > > >> -Joe >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org >> > >> > > wrote: >> > > > >> >> > > > >>> Racket version 5.3.3 is now available from >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> http://racket-lang.org/ >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> This is a bug-fix release to address a flaw in DrRacket v5.3.2 >> > > > >>> concerning interactions between the contour window and the >> syntax >> > > > >>> coloring. >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> Feedback Welcome, >> > > > >>> -- >> > > > >>> ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli >> > > Barzilay: >> > > > >>> http://barzilay.org/ >> Maze is >> > > Life! >> > > > >>> ____________________ >> > > > >>> Racket Users list: >> > > > >>> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users >> > > > >>> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > ____________________ >> > > > Racket Users list: >> > > > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users >> > > >> > >
____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
