I had a problem with my test code that led me to believe that the 64-bit version of 5.3.3 was faster than the 32-bit version... to paraphrase SNL from the good old days: "never mind."
I still do see crashes on the 64-bit version and not on 32-bit: The crashes still seem random, but do seem to occur more often in the debugger. Regards, -Joe On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Joe Gilray <jgil...@gmail.com> wrote: > Has anyone else noticed that the 64-bit version on Win7 is faster than the > 32-bit version? > > I thought that the longer pointers were supposed to slow down execution. > > BTW, still seeing some crashes on 64-bit and none on 32-bit > > Thoughts? > -Joe > > > On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Joe Gilray <jgil...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Thanks Racketeers, >> >> I am still seeing crashes on Win7 64bit with 5.3.3. About every 6 hours >> or so I get "program not responding" (doesn't seem to correlate to anything >> in particular). >> >> Haven't seen it on Win7 32 bit. >> >> -Joe >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> wrote: >> >>> Racket version 5.3.3 is now available from >>> >>> http://racket-lang.org/ >>> >>> This is a bug-fix release to address a flaw in DrRacket v5.3.2 >>> concerning interactions between the contour window and the syntax >>> coloring. >>> >>> Feedback Welcome, >>> -- >>> ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: >>> http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! >>> ____________________ >>> Racket Users list: >>> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users >>> >> >> >
____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
