Nevermind, my bad, I was using a "uninstalled racket3m" binary.
~/src/racket/build/racket/racket3m
On 12/04/2012 10:06 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
Really? What happened with the command I posted? It certainly works
for me here.
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Kevin Tew <t...@cs.utah.edu> wrote:
On 12/04/2012 08:53 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Daniel Farina <dan...@heroku.com> wrote:
I have tried the install-plain make target and it is indeed much
smaller, but it compiles/installs very little -- no raco, and
apparently very little byte-compiling, because the racket REPL takes
an age to load -- so it's basically unworkable.
Is there a reasonable in-between option?
One way to get an in-between option would be to use `make
plain-install` and then manually setup the relevant collections.
Unfortunately, this is a little more inconvenient than it could be
because `plain-install` doesn't install `raco` -- perhaps this can be
added, or a make target could be added that did this.
But even without `raco`, you should be able to run `racket -l- setup
-D racket web-server` to just set up the `racket` and `web-server`
collections, as an example (`-D` skips the documentation, which you
probably don't need on Heroku). Some simple experimentation should
determine the right set of collections.
--
sam th
sa...@ccs.neu.edu
____________________
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
I had to type `racket -l- setup -D -l racket web-server` to get this to work
for me.
Kevin
____________________
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
