Really? What happened with the command I posted? It certainly works for me here.
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Kevin Tew <t...@cs.utah.edu> wrote: > On 12/04/2012 08:53 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: >> >> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Daniel Farina <dan...@heroku.com> wrote: >>> >>> I have tried the install-plain make target and it is indeed much >>> smaller, but it compiles/installs very little -- no raco, and >>> apparently very little byte-compiling, because the racket REPL takes >>> an age to load -- so it's basically unworkable. >>> >>> Is there a reasonable in-between option? >> >> One way to get an in-between option would be to use `make >> plain-install` and then manually setup the relevant collections. >> >> Unfortunately, this is a little more inconvenient than it could be >> because `plain-install` doesn't install `raco` -- perhaps this can be >> added, or a make target could be added that did this. >> >> But even without `raco`, you should be able to run `racket -l- setup >> -D racket web-server` to just set up the `racket` and `web-server` >> collections, as an example (`-D` skips the documentation, which you >> probably don't need on Heroku). Some simple experimentation should >> determine the right set of collections. >> -- >> sam th >> sa...@ccs.neu.edu >> ____________________ >> Racket Users list: >> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users > > I had to type `racket -l- setup -D -l racket web-server` to get this to work > for me. > > Kevin -- sam th sa...@ccs.neu.edu ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
