Hi Brad: this is a 6-year old version of Racket you're using. FYI. Robby
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Bradley Lucier <luc...@math.purdue.edu> wrote: > I downloaded 64-bit Racket and compared it to my install of 64-bit gambit: > > [Media-Mac-mini-3:~/programs/gambit/bench] lucier% gsc -v > v4.6.6 20120915144211 i386-apple-darwin10.8.0 "./configure > 'CC=/pkgs/gcc-4.7.2/bin/gcc -march=core2 -fschedule-insns -frename-registers' > '--enable-single-host' '--enable-multiple-versions'" > [Media-Mac-mini-3:~/programs/gambit/bench] lucier% uname -a > Darwin Media-Mac-mini-3.local 10.8.0 Darwin Kernel Version 10.8.0: Tue Jun 7 > 16:33:36 PDT 2011; root:xnu-1504.15.3~1/RELEASE_I386 i386 > > This is a Mac Mini with a 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo and 8GB of ram. > > So this is a Gambit with special gcc options that I find generally makes code > run faster, at the expense of compile time. And it uses the latest GNU GCC. > > So this is not comparing stock gambit with stock mzscheme; it is not > comparing apples to apples. > > I applied Matthew Flatt's patch from > > https://www.cs.utah.edu/%7Emflatt/benchmarks-20100126/log1/bench.patch > > to Gambit's bench script, and then ran "table" from Gambit's bench directory. > > This gave me the following four html files that summarize the cpu and real > times to execute the programs; compile times are not reported (just because > the "table" script does not report them). > > The meanings of the various table titles can be found here: > > http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~gambit/bench.html > > I repeat: > > So this is not comparing stock gambit with stock mzscheme; it is not > comparing apples to apples. > > The systems seem comparable running programs in R6RS-* semantics, except for > programs using call-cc. > > Brad > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gambit-list mailing list > gambit-l...@iro.umontreal.ca > https://webmail.iro.umontreal.ca/mailman/listinfo/gambit-list > ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
