On 2012-11-05 08:09:19 -0500, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > It's impressive to note the change in relative performance for Racket > over past 3 years since you published the benchmarks on the blog -- > Racket has gone from slower than Gambit on the majority of benchmarks, > sometimes by a significant margin, to faster on most of them, and > never more than 2x slower (except ctak).
A follow-up blog post detailing what's improved performance-wise would be great. (and thanks for the performance!) Cheers, Asumu ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
