keywords sound wonderful. On Aug 29, 2012, at 5:33 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Matthias Felleisen > <matth...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: >> >> On Aug 29, 2012, at 5:10 PM, Robby Findler wrote: >> >>> Sorry, no. I am saying that someone could write an actual >>> judgment-form named 'when' or 'unless'. And then they wouldn't be able >>> to use it in a premise. >>> >>> Just like currently if someone defines a judgment-form named 'where' >>> they cannot use it in a premise. >> >> >> Does this mean you're willing to rule out 'where' but not 'when' >> and 'unless' which are already keywords in Racket? I am thinking >> this is an 'odd' almost 'whimsical' ruling. -- Matthias > > I don't mean this as the final say. All I want to say is that this is > an extremely precious namespace and so taking it over with alises to > existing functionality doesn't seem to meet the bar. > > But actually I had another thought: what about using keywords? > > Robby
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
