On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Matthias Felleisen <matth...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > > On Aug 29, 2012, at 5:10 PM, Robby Findler wrote: > >> Sorry, no. I am saying that someone could write an actual >> judgment-form named 'when' or 'unless'. And then they wouldn't be able >> to use it in a premise. >> >> Just like currently if someone defines a judgment-form named 'where' >> they cannot use it in a premise. > > > Does this mean you're willing to rule out 'where' but not 'when' > and 'unless' which are already keywords in Racket? I am thinking > this is an 'odd' almost 'whimsical' ruling. -- Matthias
I don't mean this as the final say. All I want to say is that this is an extremely precious namespace and so taking it over with alises to existing functionality doesn't seem to meet the bar. But actually I had another thought: what about using keywords? Robby ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
