One extra question is, what would be an appropriate format for a new racket project? Is there some consensus on that front?
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Grant Rettke <gret...@acm.org> wrote: > On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:53 AM, John Clements > <cleme...@brinckerhoff.org> wrote: >> With all due respect, I would argue against this. Schlepping eclipse >> projects from machine to machine is a giant pain, and one of the >> things that I love about Racket is the lack of metadata and the >> stripping of programs to their essence. > > Use Maven and you won't have such problems. -- Eduardo Bellani "Resolve to serve no more, and you are at once freed." ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
