On May 29, 2012, at 11:48 AM, Eduardo Bellani wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Is there some sort of new project command for raco? > > Something that would create a new project with a default skeleton > structure that is suggested by the racket community? If not, would > that be a good idea? There are precedents, with Leiningen for clojure, > rails scripts, and similar tools.
With all due respect, I would argue against this. Schlepping eclipse projects from machine to machine is a giant pain, and one of the things that I love about Racket is the lack of metadata and the stripping of programs to their essence. I understand that beginners are often happy to get a whole bunch of code set up for them, so that they can examine it for clues as to how things should work, but I don't think this makes sense for Racket. Re: planet: I agree that assembling planet packages is not as smooth as it could be, but I think that the solution there is our new shiny planet replacement that I'm definitely not asking about because I don't have time to work on it :). John
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
