At Sun, 20 May 2012 22:42:30 -0600, Jon Rafkind wrote: > The issue is why do I have to use a name other than 'name' for the > pattern variable on the line where it says 'HERE'. If I use the > 'name' pattern variable then the syntax-parse form generated by > 'make-transformer' will use the wrong lexical context for the literal > set. I don't see how the lexical context of the outer 'name' differs > from the inner 'new-name', other than the 'new-name' has an extra > mark on it.
When you use `name' instead of `new-name', then `name' gets replaced by `x' from the use of `define-new-syntax', and `x' (unlike `name') has a different lexical context than `new-name'. ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
