What exactly are the semantics of #:at inside a #:literal-sets ([x #:at y]) ?
>From the docs " If the #:at keyword is given, the lexical context of the lctx >term is used to determine which identifiers in the patterns are treated as >literals;". In what way is 'lctx' used?
____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
