Oh, I don't think we need to make any special rules to include that function in a list of impressive functions! It is very cool.
Robby On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Neil Toronto <neil.toro...@gmail.com> wrote: > What if we further require quines to apply at least one function that they > contain? I want to include Eduardo's function in the class of "impressive" > ones. > > Neil ⊥ > > > On 02/24/2012 06:35 PM, Robby Findler wrote: >> >> This is pretty boring too. :) >> >>> "" >> >> "" >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Neil Toronto<neil.toro...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> I dunno. It might work better if we require quines to produce themselves >>> in >>> quoted form. Then the empty program isn't one. >>> >>> Neil >>> >>> >>> On 02/24/2012 06:28 PM, Robby Findler wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Doesn't work as well in Racket as in Scheme, that one! >>>> >>>> Robby >>>> >>>> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Eduardo Bellani<ebell...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Does this count? >>>>> >>>>> ((λ (x) (list x (list 'quote x))) '(λ (x) (list x (list 'quote x)))) >>>>> >>>>> On 02/23/2012 04:52 PM, Gary Baumgartner wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 12:04:50PM -0600, Robby Findler wrote: >>>>>> [...] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What is this thing? It seems coolly symmetric in this view: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> [...] >>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomae%27s_function >>>>>> ____________________ >>>>>> Racket Users list: >>>>>> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Eduardo Bellani >>>>> >>>>> fear is an alarm, not a compass. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ____________________ >>>> Racket Users list: >>>> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users >>> >>> >>> >>> ____________________ >>> Racket Users list: >>> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users > > ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
